| Pages: [1] |
1. Traquility Server offline? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Maliceth Crimson wrote: How about that? Feels like digital castration for some i guess. Indeed. Well, the client works fine. The launcher just incorrectly reports server offline still. Check your launcher and see for yourself. Curious.
- by Andy Landen - at 2013.04.24 16:50:00
|
2. Traquility Server offline? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Interesting. I click play and the client says the server is online .. what is wrong with the launcher, I wonder.
- by Andy Landen - at 2013.04.24 16:28:00
|
3. Traquility Server offline? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
http://eve-offline.net/ says tranquility is online but the launcher says it is offline. Is the server offline? If so, is there an update? Does anyone know anything about the current state of the server?
- by Andy Landen - at 2013.04.24 16:27:00
|
4. Ancillary Shield Booster: or how CCP made gallente suck even more in comparison - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Chutney Hustler wrote: ... X-L ASB - 9800hp 2x LSE - 5250hp Basically, ASBs are always better, until you receive such DPS that you are unable to boost all 10 charges before you pop (assuming you are using non-Navy). Takes about 40 seconds ...
- by Andy Landen - at 2012.07.05 21:24:00
|
5. Ancillary Shield Booster: or how CCP made gallente suck even more in comparison - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
stoicfaux wrote: Ancillary boosted neuts/nos. Ancillary boosted ABs/MWDs. Ancillary boosted guns/launchers/smartbombs. (Increases range on blasters/ACs, increases damage on rails/artillery, increases both on lasers, increases missile speed, inc...
- by Andy Landen - at 2012.07.02 22:03:00
|
6. Sticky:Incursion fixes/feedback thread - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
sweetrock wrote: Bringing this back to the front page. Incursions are terrible now, CCP swang, missed and destroyed the wall behind. Totally over nerfed. Sites take 3 times longer, the risk is far too high for the rewards. Who the hell wants t...
- by Andy Landen - at 2012.06.14 12:59:00
|
7. Sticky:Incursion fixes/feedback thread - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I find it odd how Concord can own any number of ships committing illegal aggression within a few seconds while in a high sec incursion, but the sansha ships are left untouched, despite the bounties on their heads. With how powerful Concord ships a...
- by Andy Landen - at 2012.06.11 00:16:00
|
8. Sticky:Incursion fixes/feedback thread - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
KrakizBad wrote: DarthNefarius wrote: Shobon Welp wrote: Jita Joe2 Jones wrote: So? tritanium is 5.86 today and a plex is still 480 mil, so screwing 1000's of people out of their entertainment hasnt alleviated the supposed inflatio...
- by Andy Landen - at 2012.06.05 00:23:00
|
9. How you found EVE. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I did a google search for spaceship game. Started Gallente but didn't understand tanking at all, or warping out without your T1 drones. Somewhere in the tutorials, they should say that civilian stuff is junk. They should also say that there is no ...
- by Andy Landen - at 2012.04.06 00:20:00
|
10. Sticky:Incursion fixes/feedback thread - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Incursions is the best thing that happened to Eve for at least 3 reasons. 1. Players gain access to smart NPC combat which requires them to unite with logis, resists, and dps. 2. Rich rewards are brought from the wormholes to the masses. Nice sh...
- by Andy Landen - at 2012.01.25 06:10:00
|
11. New Drake - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Gypsio III wrote: Nerf the Drake. Nerf the Hurricane. Nerf all tier 2 BCs. They're too common. They obsolete tier 1 BCs, cruisers and close-range HACs like the Deimos and Sacrilege. Nerf them to tier 1 levels and let's get some variety back, ...
- by Andy Landen - at 2011.10.18 19:42:00
|
12. should there be a counter to blobs? is the end game more ships = win? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
in a word, yes. more ships = win, unless they fight stupid or neglect smart, tactical decisions, or simply use too many weak ships against strong ships, or neglect important things like points, RR, etc.. So all things equal, then yes, otherwise, n...
- by Andy Landen - at 2011.10.17 22:06:00
|
13. Goons "legalising" botting!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
You know, this whole issue would be so much easier and more enjoyable if botting was allowed. Then we could all enjoy it as simply another "game mechanic." I say, make it available to everyone, and then the outsiders would not be so jealous of th...
- by Andy Landen - at 2011.09.30 16:09:00
|
14. Credit where credit is due: Team Gridlock shout out - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Thanks for the update to my thread: post 114794. Let's get some dates and commitments now please.
- by Andy Landen - at 2011.09.28 21:09:00
|
15. Keeping drones though server crashes requires work. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Just an FYI. An item has to be destroyed before it can be reimbursed. Funny that no one considers themselves evil, even while caught in the thick of it.
- by Andy Landen - at 2011.05.14 04:38:00
|
16. Keeping drones though server crashes requires work. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
If the server crashes and the rats don't destroy your drones, CCP won't reimburse you for them according to a GM (not sure if I can mention his name). You are expected to either have a bm where you launched them or scan them down before another pl...
- by Andy Landen - at 2011.05.14 03:52:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |